Eсли типичному современному русскому пилоту сказать "это параплан 1-2", то в голове у этого пилота немедленно возникнет понимание, что речь идёт об аппарате для пилотов, окончивших лётную школу, обладающем высокой пассивной безопасностью, но вряд ли пригодном для серьёзных маршрутных полётов.

серьёзных маршрутных полётов

То есть EN-B может быть как LTF2-3

Интересно, что сертификацию протекторов производит только DHV.

25.09.2010
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PMA statement concerning the re-testing by DHV on reversible harness protectors
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At August 27 2010 the DHV published on its website an “unofficial test report” on 5 reversible harnesses with airbag protectors, 4 of them have rescue parachute containers under the seat read more.
The airbag protectors of the 4 reversible harnesses with integrated rescue containers under the seat were previously tested following LTF 35/03 by EAPR using a standard dummy rescue system installed into the integrated rescue containers of the harnesses.

The PMA welcome that all test centres take care to ensure that products made available to the flying public are safe and comply with the existing norms. But the PMA would very much appreciate, that any follow up tests are done with the manufacturers knowing of the test centres concerns, so they can actively take part in any subsequent checks. If the concerns show to be valid then the manufacturers can take the necessary actions without any confusing information being put out to the public.

The PMA disagrees with the publication of these test results on the DHV website because of the following reasons:

1) The different deceleration figures with and without rescue system installed into the container under the seat do not only concern reversible harnesses with airbag, but concern all harnesses with rescue container under the seat, those with airbag protector and also those with foam protector. This is known from various protector tests made by harness manufacturers (Woody Valley).

2) It is not specified in the LTF 35/03, nor by the 2nd protector test symposium nor in LTF 91/09 that protectors in harnesses shall be tested without a rescue system installed into the rescue container. To test with a rescue installed is logical and reflects the most common accident situation where a harness protector is needed during take-off and landing.
In addition we would like to point out that after a rescue deployment the pilot is hanging from his shoulder straps and will be in forward leaning position which means the protector is less likely to be of use. Moreover the rate of descent after a parachute deployment is specified such that a protector is not required.